
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6600S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅7.0% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $171 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 70.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 55.4 vs 32.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6600S is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 80W.
- ❌22800% longer card at 229mm vs 1mm.
Radeon RX 6600S
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 125W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 229mm, a 228mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌74.7% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 32.5 vs 55.4 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
2019Radeon RX 6600S
2022Why buy it
- ✅7.0% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $171 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 70.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 55.4 vs 32.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 125W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 229mm, a 228mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6600S is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 80W.
- ❌22800% longer card at 229mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌74.7% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 32.5 vs 55.4 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6600S better than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 416 FPS |
| medium | 444 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 343 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 88 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 75 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and Radeon RX 6600S

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.

Radeon RX 6600S
Radeon RX 6600S
The Radeon RX 6600S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,016 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER scores 12,692 and the Radeon RX 6600S reaches 13,016 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 6600S uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600S). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600S). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 2000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,692 | 13,016+3% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 1792+27% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 7.168 TFLOPS+43% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 2000 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 88 | 112+27% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+180% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6600S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6600S has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600S) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600S) — the Radeon RX 6600S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+50% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6600S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600S). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6600S).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER draws 125W versus the Radeon RX 6600S's 80W — a 43.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6600S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6600S). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 229mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 80W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 229mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.5 | 162.7+60% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER launched at $229 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6600S launched at $400. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER costs 42.8% less ($171 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 55.4 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 32.5 (Radeon RX 6600S) — the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER offers 70.5% better value. The Radeon RX 6600S is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Radeon RX 6600S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-43% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.4+70% | 32.5 |
| Codename | TU116 | Navi 23 |
| Release | October 29 2019 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #207 | #200 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












