
Arc B570
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc B570
2025Why buy it
- ✅23.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Radeon RX 6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc B570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 64.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
Arc B570
2025Radeon RX 6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅23.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc B570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 64.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Arc B570 better than Radeon RX 6600M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6600M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 313 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 313 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 157 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 124 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc B570 and Radeon RX 6600M

Arc B570
Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.

Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6600M
The Radeon RX 6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,922 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc B570 scores 14,060 and the Radeon RX 6600M reaches 13,922 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc B570 is built on Xe2 while the Radeon RX 6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Arc B570) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600M). Raw compute: 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600M). Boost clocks: 2500 MHz vs 2416 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (Arc B570) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6600M) with 144 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,060 | 13,922 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+29% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.52 TFLOPS+33% | 8.659 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2500 MHz+3% | 2416 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+29% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+800% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+800% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 28+56% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc B570 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 380 GB/s (Arc B570) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600M) — a 69.6% advantage for the Arc B570. Bus width: 160-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B570) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600M) — the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 380 GB/s+70% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 160-bit+25% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+800% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B570) vs 12 (FL 12_2) (Radeon RX 6600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (FL 12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media (Arc B570) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600M). Decoder: Intel Xe Media vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600M).
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc B570 draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 6600M's 100W — a 40% difference. The Radeon RX 6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B570) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6600M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 100W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 249mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 93.7 | 139.2+49% |
Value Analysis
The Arc B570 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 6600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219 | — |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | Navi 23 |
| Release | January 16 2025 | May 31 2021 |
| Ranking | #169 | #173 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













