
GRID P40-8Q
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID P40-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
GRID P40-8Q
2015Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GRID P40-8Q better than Radeon RX 6500M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 6500M make more sense than GRID P40-8Q?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 57 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 51 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-8Q and Radeon RX 6500M

GRID P40-8Q
GRID P40-8Q
The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.

Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6500M
The Radeon RX 6500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,443 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-8Q scores 7,507 and the Radeon RX 6500M reaches 7,443 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6500M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-8Q) vs 4.915 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500M). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,507 | 7,443 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 4.915 TFLOPS+2% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 2400 MHz+104% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GRID P40-8Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P40-8Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500M) — the GRID P40-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6500M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6500M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon RX 6500M).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 6500M's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 50W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 33.4 | 148.9+346% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6500M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 24 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #505 | #341 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












