
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅16.1% more average FPS across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 48.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Radeon RX 6500 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌17.8% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 48.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon RX 6500 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅16.1% more average FPS across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 31.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 48.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌17.8% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 48.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon RX 6500 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6500 XT still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 25 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 70 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 59 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon RX 6500 XT

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon RX 6500 XT
Radeon RX 6500 XT
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2610 MHz to 2815 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 107W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,603 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX 6500 XT's 9,603 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 11.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6500 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.765 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2815 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 16 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+12% | 9,603 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+125% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+18% | 5.765 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2815 MHz+91% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72+13% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+820% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18+13% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6500 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6500 XT has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s+17% | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs None (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6500 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 3.0 (Limited) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 6500 XT's 107W — a 41.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 172mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-35% | 107W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-25% | 400W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 172mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+71% | 89.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6500 XT launched at $199. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 15.1% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48.3 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 31.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-15% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+32% | 48.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 24 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #252 | #270 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












