
Arc A730M
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A730M
2022Why buy it
- ✅90.2% more average FPS across 24 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 107W, a 27W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6500 XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 48.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon RX 6500 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A730M across 24 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌33.8% higher power demand at 107W vs 80W.
Arc A730M
2022Radeon RX 6500 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅90.2% more average FPS across 24 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 107W, a 27W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6500 XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 48.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A730M across 24 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌33.8% higher power demand at 107W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is Arc A730M better than Radeon RX 6500 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 6500 XT make more sense than Arc A730M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A730M | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A730M | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 310 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 25 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A730M | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 70 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A730M | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 59 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A730M and Radeon RX 6500 XT

Arc A730M
Arc A730M
The Arc A730M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,808 points.

Radeon RX 6500 XT
Radeon RX 6500 XT
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2610 MHz to 2815 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 107W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,603 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A730M scores 9,808 and the Radeon RX 6500 XT reaches 9,603 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A730M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 6500 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A730M) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Raw compute: 12.6 TFLOPS (Arc A730M) vs 5.765 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 2815 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (Arc A730M) vs 16 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) with 384 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Arc A730M | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,808+2% | 9,603 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+200% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.6 TFLOPS+119% | 5.765 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz | 2815 MHz+37% |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+200% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+1700% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+1100% | 1 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24+50% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A730M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Arc A730M | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A730M comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6500 XT has 4 GB. The Arc A730M offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (Arc A730M) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — a 133.3% advantage for the Arc A730M. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Arc A730M) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500 XT) — the Arc A730M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A730M | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+133% | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+1100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A730M) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Arc A730M | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A730M) vs None (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A730M) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6500 XT).
| Feature | Arc A730M | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | None |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 3.0 (Limited) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A730M draws 80W versus the Radeon RX 6500 XT's 107W — a 28.9% difference. The Arc A730M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A730M) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 172mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Arc A730M | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-25% | 107W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 172mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 122.6+37% | 89.7 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













