
GRID P40-8Q
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID P40-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1407.5% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,801 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1428.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on Unknown node with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GRID P40-8Q
2015Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,801 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1428.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on Unknown node with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1407.5% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6500 better than GRID P40-8Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GRID P40-8Q make more sense than Radeon RX 6500?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-8Q and Radeon RX 6500

GRID P40-8Q
GRID P40-8Q
The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.

Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500
The Radeon RX 6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in sem dados. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,610 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-8Q scores 7,507 and the Radeon RX 6500 reaches 7,610 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,507 | 7,610+1% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GRID P40-8Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs None (Radeon RX 6500). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6500).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 6500's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-8Q) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 172mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 172mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 33.4 | 101.5+204% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-8Q launched at $3000 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6500 launched at $199. The Radeon RX 6500 costs 93.4% less ($2801 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 38.2 (Radeon RX 6500) — the Radeon RX 6500 offers 1428% better value.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $199-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 38.2+1428% |
| Codename | GM204 | — |
| Release | August 30 2015 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #505 | #335 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












