G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro W9100

2014

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
2415.7% HIGHER MSRP
$4,000 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 48.6 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
❌418.9% higher power demand at 275W vs 53W.

Radeon RX 6400

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,841 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2409.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.6 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 53W instead of 275W, a 222W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

FirePro W9100

2014

Radeon RX 6400

2022

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,841 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2409.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.6 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 53W instead of 275W, a 222W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
2415.7% HIGHER MSRP
$4,000 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 48.6 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
❌418.9% higher power demand at 275W vs 53W.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro W9100 better than Radeon RX 6400?

Yes. FirePro W9100 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 7,748 vs 7,728 in G3D Mark. On top of that, FirePro W9100 is a 2014 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon RX 6400 is a 2022 model from an older generation with FSR 3 + AFMF. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2014, better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 6nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

FirePro W9100 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. FirePro W9100 is about 2415.7% more expensive on MSRP at $4,000 MSRP versus $159 MSRP, and you are getting 0.3% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 6400 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Radeon RX 6400 make more sense than FirePro W9100?

Yes. Radeon RX 6400 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (53W vs 275W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $159 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of FirePro W9100. The trade-off is that FirePro W9100 currently gives you 0.3% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 6400 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro W9100 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6400 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	FirePro W9100	Radeon RX 6400
1080p
low	200 FPS	129 FPS
medium	178 FPS	115 FPS
high	147 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	73 FPS
1440p
low	174 FPS	118 FPS
medium	152 FPS	99 FPS
high	109 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	66 FPS	49 FPS
medium	60 FPS	46 FPS
high	40 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	30 FPS

Open FirePro W9100 Open Radeon RX 6400

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	FirePro W9100	Radeon RX 6400
1080p
low	260 FPS	165 FPS
medium	222 FPS	129 FPS
high	176 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	141 FPS	62 FPS
1440p
low	187 FPS	107 FPS
medium	155 FPS	82 FPS
high	132 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	42 FPS
4K
low	103 FPS	54 FPS
medium	86 FPS	42 FPS
high	72 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	20 FPS

Open FirePro W9100 Open Radeon RX 6400

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	FirePro W9100	Radeon RX 6400
1080p
low	349 FPS	348 FPS
medium	279 FPS	278 FPS
high	232 FPS	232 FPS
ultra	174 FPS	174 FPS
1440p
low	261 FPS	261 FPS
medium	209 FPS	209 FPS
high	174 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	174 FPS	154 FPS
medium	139 FPS	139 FPS
high	116 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	70 FPS

Open FirePro W9100 Open Radeon RX 6400

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	FirePro W9100	Radeon RX 6400
1080p
low	317 FPS	270 FPS
medium	275 FPS	203 FPS
high	226 FPS	182 FPS
ultra	174 FPS	151 FPS
1440p
low	234 FPS	204 FPS
medium	204 FPS	149 FPS
high	161 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	107 FPS
4K
low	127 FPS	107 FPS
medium	100 FPS	80 FPS
high	81 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	54 FPS

Open FirePro W9100 Open Radeon RX 6400

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W9100 and Radeon RX 6400

FirePro W9100

The FirePro W9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 26 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,748 points.

Radeon RX 6400

The Radeon RX 6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1923 MHz to 2321 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 53W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,728 points. Launch price was $159.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W9100 scores 7,748 and the Radeon RX 6400 reaches 7,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (FirePro W9100) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6400). Raw compute: 5.238 TFLOPS (FirePro W9100) vs 3.565 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6400).

Feature	FirePro W9100	Radeon RX 6400
G3D Mark Score	7,748	7,728
Architecture	GCN 2.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2816+267%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.238 TFLOPS+47%	3.565 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	176+267%	48
L1 Cache	704 KB+175%	256 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro W9100 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	FirePro W9100	Radeon RX 6400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W9100 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6400 has 4 GB. The FirePro W9100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	FirePro W9100	Radeon RX 6400
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9100) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6400). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 2.

Feature	FirePro W9100	Radeon RX 6400
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+200%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W9100) vs None (Radeon RX 6400). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro W9100) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6400).

Feature	FirePro W9100	Radeon RX 6400
Encoder	VCE 2.0	None
Decoder	UVD 4.2	VCN 3.0 (Limited)
Codecs	H.264	MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W9100 draws 275W versus the Radeon RX 6400's 53W — a 135.4% difference. The Radeon RX 6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9100) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 275mm vs 172mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 93 vs 75°C.

Feature	FirePro W9100	Radeon RX 6400
TDP	275W	53W-81%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	275mm	172mm
Height	111mm	112mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	93	75°C-19%
Perf/Watt	28.2	145.8+417%

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W9100 launched at $4000 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6400 launched at $159. The Radeon RX 6400 costs 96% less ($3841 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (FirePro W9100) vs 48.6 (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon RX 6400 offers 2457.9% better value. The Radeon RX 6400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).