Quadro P3000 (móvel) vs Radeon RX 6300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

2017

Why buy it

✅22.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

2017

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Why buy it

✅22.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6300M better than Quadro P3000 (móvel)?

Yes. Radeon RX 6300M is clearly the better overall GPU here. Quadro P3000 (móvel) averages 22.6% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 6,421 vs 6,385 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 6300M is a 2022 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while Quadro P3000 (móvel) is a 2017 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6300M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2017, better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 6nm process instead of 16nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6300M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon RX 6300M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $600 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.6% higher G3D Mark. Quadro P3000 (móvel) really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Quadro P3000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Quadro P3000 (móvel) is 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 6,385 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P3000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6300M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro P3000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	81 FPS	104 FPS
medium	69 FPS	92 FPS
high	58 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	66 FPS
1440p
low	70 FPS	94 FPS
medium	61 FPS	80 FPS
high	45 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	25 FPS	45 FPS
medium	24 FPS	42 FPS
high	16 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	28 FPS

Open Quadro P3000 (móvel)Open Radeon RX 6300M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro P3000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	208 FPS	158 FPS
medium	176 FPS	124 FPS
high	133 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	59 FPS
1440p
low	154 FPS	104 FPS
medium	128 FPS	81 FPS
high	101 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	41 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	53 FPS
medium	70 FPS	41 FPS
high	58 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	20 FPS

Open Quadro P3000 (móvel)Open Radeon RX 6300M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro P3000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	287 FPS	289 FPS
medium	230 FPS	231 FPS
high	192 FPS	193 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	215 FPS	217 FPS
medium	172 FPS	173 FPS
high	144 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	144 FPS	133 FPS
medium	115 FPS	116 FPS
high	93 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	54 FPS

Open Quadro P3000 (móvel)Open Radeon RX 6300M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro P3000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	159 FPS	257 FPS
medium	129 FPS	191 FPS
high	112 FPS	169 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	141 FPS
1440p
low	112 FPS	191 FPS
medium	92 FPS	138 FPS
high	80 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	65 FPS	100 FPS
4K
low	63 FPS	100 FPS
medium	50 FPS	74 FPS
high	39 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	50 FPS

Open Quadro P3000 (móvel)Open Radeon RX 6300M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3000 (móvel) and Radeon RX 6300M

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1088 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,385 points.

Radeon RX 6300M

The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3000 (móvel) scores 6,385 and the Radeon RX 6300M reaches 6,421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M). Raw compute: 3.11 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M). Boost clocks: 1215 MHz vs 2400 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P3000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 6300M
G3D Mark Score	6,385	6,421
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	1280+67%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.11 TFLOPS	3.686 TFLOPS+19%
Boost Clock	1215 MHz	2400 MHz+98%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	80+67%	48
L1 Cache	480 KB+88%	256 KB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Quadro P3000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 6300M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 32-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) — the Quadro P3000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P3000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 6300M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+700%	32-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3000 (móvel) draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.