G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P3000

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌614.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 35W.

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 250W, a 215W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Quadro P3000

2016

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 250W, a 215W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌614.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6300M better than Quadro P3000?

Yes. Radeon RX 6300M is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 6,421 vs 6,384 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 6300M is a 2022 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while Quadro P3000 is a 2016 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6300M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016, better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 6nm process instead of 16nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6300M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon RX 6300M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $600 MSRP, and you are getting 0.6% higher G3D Mark. Quadro P3000 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Quadro P3000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Quadro P3000 is 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM, 6,384 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P3000 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6300M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro P3000	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	141 FPS	104 FPS
medium	130 FPS	92 FPS
high	110 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	66 FPS
1440p
low	125 FPS	94 FPS
medium	107 FPS	80 FPS
high	89 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	57 FPS	45 FPS
medium	50 FPS	42 FPS
high	41 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	28 FPS

Open Quadro P3000 Open Radeon RX 6300M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro P3000	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	287 FPS	158 FPS
medium	230 FPS	124 FPS
high	192 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	59 FPS
1440p
low	215 FPS	104 FPS
medium	172 FPS	81 FPS
high	144 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	41 FPS
4K
low	102 FPS	53 FPS
medium	83 FPS	41 FPS
high	70 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	20 FPS

Open Quadro P3000 Open Radeon RX 6300M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro P3000	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	287 FPS	289 FPS
medium	230 FPS	231 FPS
high	192 FPS	193 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	215 FPS	217 FPS
medium	172 FPS	173 FPS
high	144 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	144 FPS	133 FPS
medium	115 FPS	116 FPS
high	96 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	54 FPS

Open Quadro P3000 Open Radeon RX 6300M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro P3000	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	287 FPS	257 FPS
medium	230 FPS	191 FPS
high	192 FPS	169 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	141 FPS
1440p
low	215 FPS	191 FPS
medium	172 FPS	138 FPS
high	144 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	100 FPS
4K
low	144 FPS	100 FPS
medium	115 FPS	74 FPS
high	96 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	50 FPS

Open Quadro P3000 Open Radeon RX 6300M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3000 and Radeon RX 6300M

Quadro P3000

The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.

Radeon RX 6300M

The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3000 scores 6,384 and the Radeon RX 6300M reaches 6,421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P3000) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 2400 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P3000	Radeon RX 6300M
G3D Mark Score	6,384	6,421
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	3840+400%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.63 TFLOPS+243%	3.686 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1645 MHz	2400 MHz+46%
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	240+400%	48
L1 Cache	1.4 MB+460%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P3000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Quadro P3000	Radeon RX 6300M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P3000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300M has 4 GB. The Quadro P3000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 32-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P3000) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) — the Quadro P3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P3000	Radeon RX 6300M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+700%	32-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro P3000	Radeon RX 6300M
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs Navi 24 Media. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P3000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M).

Feature	Quadro P3000	Radeon RX 6300M
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)	—
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	Navi 24 Media
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3000 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 150.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.