GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX 6300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

2013

Why buy it

✅6.1% more average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌614.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 35W.

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 250W, a 215W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

2013

Radeon RX 6300M

2022

Why buy it

✅6.1% more average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 250W, a 215W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌614.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 better than Radeon RX 6300M?

Yes. GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 averages 6.1% more FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 6,500 vs 6,421 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is a 2013 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon RX 6300M is a 2022 model from an older generation with FSR 3 + AFMF. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6300M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2013, better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 6nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $649 MSRP. GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $649 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 6.1% more estimated average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.2% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 6300M is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (35W vs 250W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon RX 6300M make more sense than GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2?

Yes. Radeon RX 6300M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (35W vs 250W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 currently gives you 1.2% higher G3D Mark and 6.1% more estimated average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6300M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	78 FPS	104 FPS
medium	67 FPS	92 FPS
high	54 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	66 FPS
1440p
low	68 FPS	94 FPS
medium	60 FPS	80 FPS
high	43 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	25 FPS	45 FPS
medium	24 FPS	42 FPS
high	16 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	13 FPS	28 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 Open Radeon RX 6300M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	168 FPS	158 FPS
medium	141 FPS	124 FPS
high	108 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	59 FPS
1440p
low	114 FPS	104 FPS
medium	85 FPS	81 FPS
high	65 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	41 FPS
4K
low	49 FPS	53 FPS
medium	39 FPS	41 FPS
high	34 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	20 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 Open Radeon RX 6300M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	292 FPS	289 FPS
medium	234 FPS	231 FPS
high	195 FPS	193 FPS
ultra	146 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	219 FPS	217 FPS
medium	176 FPS	173 FPS
high	146 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	146 FPS	133 FPS
medium	117 FPS	116 FPS
high	98 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	54 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 Open Radeon RX 6300M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	Radeon RX 6300M
1080p
low	146 FPS	257 FPS
medium	116 FPS	191 FPS
high	96 FPS	169 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	141 FPS
1440p
low	106 FPS	191 FPS
medium	85 FPS	138 FPS
high	72 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	100 FPS
4K
low	63 FPS	100 FPS
medium	47 FPS	74 FPS
high	37 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	50 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 Open Radeon RX 6300M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and Radeon RX 6300M

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon RX 6300M

The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 and the Radeon RX 6300M reaches 6,421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 2400 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	Radeon RX 6300M
G3D Mark Score	6,500+1%	6,421
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2304+200%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.156 TFLOPS+13%	3.686 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	902 MHz	2400 MHz+166%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	192+300%	48
L1 Cache	192 KB	256 KB+33%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6300M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	Radeon RX 6300M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300M) — a 350% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2. Bus width: 384-bit vs 32-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) — the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2	Radeon RX 6300M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s+350%	64 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit+1100%	32-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 150.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Mobile.