
GRID P40-8Q
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 580X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID P40-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1210% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 32.7 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon RX 580X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,771 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1207.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.7 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GRID P40-8Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID P40-8Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GRID P40-8Q
2015Radeon RX 580X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,771 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1207.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.7 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GRID P40-8Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID P40-8Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1210% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 32.7 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is GRID P40-8Q better than Radeon RX 580X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 580X make more sense than GRID P40-8Q?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 84 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 75 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-8Q and Radeon RX 580X

GRID P40-8Q
GRID P40-8Q
The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.

Radeon RX 580X
Radeon RX 580X
The Radeon RX 580X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1257 MHz to 1340 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,495 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-8Q scores 7,507 and the Radeon RX 580X reaches 7,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 580X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 580X). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-8Q) vs 6.175 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580X). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1340 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,507 | 7,495 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 6.175 TFLOPS+28% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1340 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 144+13% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+33% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 580X is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GRID P40-8Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P40-8Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 580X has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 580X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 580X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 580X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 580X).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 580X's 185W — a 19.5% difference. The Radeon RX 580X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-8Q) vs 500W (Radeon RX 580X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 185W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 33.4 | 40.5+21% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-8Q launched at $3000 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 580X launched at $229. The Radeon RX 580X costs 92.4% less ($2771 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 32.7 (Radeon RX 580X) — the Radeon RX 580X offers 1208% better value. The Radeon RX 580X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $229-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 32.7+1208% |
| Codename | GM204 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #505 | #337 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












