
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 185W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌991.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 38.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon RX 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,270 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 966.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.4 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P5000 (móvel): it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P5000 (móvel) is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌85% higher power demand at 185W vs 100W.
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
2017Radeon RX 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 185W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,270 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 966.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.4 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P5000 (móvel): it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P5000 (móvel) is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌991.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 38.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌85% higher power demand at 185W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P5000 (móvel) better than Radeon RX 580?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 580 make more sense than Quadro P5000 (móvel)?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 99 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 85 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5000 (móvel) and Radeon RX 580

Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1278 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,000 points. Launch price was $1,885.

Radeon RX 580
Radeon RX 580
The Radeon RX 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1257 MHz to 1340 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,799 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) scores 9,000 and the Radeon RX 580 reaches 8,799 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 580 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 580). Raw compute: 6.48 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 6.175 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 1340 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,000+2% | 8,799 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.48 TFLOPS+5% | 6.175 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz+18% | 1340 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 144+13% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+33% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 580 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 580 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 580 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 12 (Radeon RX 580). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX 580). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 580).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 580's 185W — a 59.6% difference. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 500W (Radeon RX 580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-46% | 185W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 90.0+89% | 47.6 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) launched at $2499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 580 launched at $229. The Radeon RX 580 costs 90.8% less ($2270 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.6 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 38.4 (Radeon RX 580) — the Radeon RX 580 offers 966.7% better value.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $229-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.6 | 38.4+967% |
| Codename | GP104 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #235 | #301 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













