
CMP 40HX
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 40HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌205.2% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 38.4 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon RX 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 207% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.4 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
CMP 40HX
2021Radeon RX 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 241mm, a 12mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 207% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.4 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌205.2% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 38.4 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 580 better than CMP 40HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does CMP 40HX make more sense than Radeon RX 580?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 99 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 85 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 40HX and Radeon RX 580

CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon RX 580
Radeon RX 580
The Radeon RX 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1257 MHz to 1340 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,799 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 40HX scores 8,749 and the Radeon RX 580 reaches 8,799 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 580 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 580). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 6.175 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1340 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749 | 8,799 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS+23% | 6.175 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz+23% | 1340 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+311% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 580 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The CMP 40HX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 40HX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 580 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 580 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 580) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12 (Radeon RX 580). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX 580). Decoder: No vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | No | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the Radeon RX 580's 185W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 500W (Radeon RX 580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W | 185W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 47.6 |
Value Analysis
The CMP 40HX launched at $699 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 580 launched at $229. The Radeon RX 580 costs 67.2% less ($470 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 38.4 (Radeon RX 580) — the Radeon RX 580 offers 207.2% better value. The CMP 40HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $229-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 38.4+207% |
| Codename | TU106 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #302 | #301 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













