
GRID P40-8Q
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID P40-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1210% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon RX 580 2048SP
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,771 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1232% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GRID P40-8Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID P40-8Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 16 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GRID P40-8Q
2015Radeon RX 580 2048SP
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,771 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1232% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GRID P40-8Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID P40-8Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1210% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 16 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 580 2048SP better than GRID P40-8Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID P40-8Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 86 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-8Q and Radeon RX 580 2048SP

GRID P40-8Q
GRID P40-8Q
The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.

Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Radeon RX 580 2048SP
The Radeon RX 580 2048SP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1168 MHz to 1284 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,633 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-8Q scores 7,507 and the Radeon RX 580 2048SP reaches 7,633 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 580 2048SP uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-8Q) vs 5.259 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580 2048SP). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1284 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,507 | 7,633+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 5.259 TFLOPS+9% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1284 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 580 2048SP is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GRID P40-8Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P40-8Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 580 2048SP has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 580 2048SP offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 580 2048SP's 150W — a 40% difference. The Radeon RX 580 2048SP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-8Q) vs 450W (Radeon RX 580 2048SP). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 150W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 33.4 | 50.9+52% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-8Q launched at $3000 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 580 2048SP launched at $229. The Radeon RX 580 2048SP costs 92.4% less ($2771 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 33.3 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP) — the Radeon RX 580 2048SP offers 1232% better value. The Radeon RX 580 2048SP is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $229-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 33.3+1232% |
| Codename | GM204 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | October 15 2018 |
| Ranking | #505 | #334 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












