
FirePro W9100
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro W9100
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1646.7% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌83.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 150W.
Radeon RX 580 2048SP
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,771 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1620.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than FirePro W9100: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro W9100 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 275W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 16 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
FirePro W9100
2014Radeon RX 580 2048SP
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,771 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1620.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.3 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than FirePro W9100: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro W9100 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 275W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1646.7% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌83.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 16 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro W9100 better than Radeon RX 580 2048SP?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 580 2048SP make more sense than FirePro W9100?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro W9100 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro W9100 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro W9100 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro W9100 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 317 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W9100 and Radeon RX 580 2048SP

FirePro W9100
FirePro W9100
The FirePro W9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 26 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,748 points.

Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Radeon RX 580 2048SP
The Radeon RX 580 2048SP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1168 MHz to 1284 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,633 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W9100 scores 7,748 and the Radeon RX 580 2048SP reaches 7,633 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX 580 2048SP uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (FirePro W9100) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP). Raw compute: 5.238 TFLOPS (FirePro W9100) vs 5.259 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580 2048SP).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,748+2% | 7,633 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816+38% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.238 TFLOPS | 5.259 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 176+38% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+38% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 580 2048SP is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro W9100 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (FirePro W9100) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 580 2048SP) — the Radeon RX 580 2048SP has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9100) vs 12 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W9100) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro W9100) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W9100 draws 275W versus the Radeon RX 580 2048SP's 150W — a 58.8% difference. The Radeon RX 580 2048SP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9100) vs 450W (Radeon RX 580 2048SP). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 275mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 93 vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 150W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 275mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 93 | 75°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 28.2 | 50.9+80% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W9100 launched at $4000 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 580 2048SP launched at $229. The Radeon RX 580 2048SP costs 94.3% less ($3771 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (FirePro W9100) vs 33.3 (Radeon RX 580 2048SP) — the Radeon RX 580 2048SP offers 1652.6% better value. The Radeon RX 580 2048SP is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro W9100 | Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4000 | $229-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | 33.3+1653% |
| Codename | Hawaii | Polaris 20 |
| Release | March 26 2014 | October 15 2018 |
| Ranking | #328 | #334 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












