
GeForce GTX 980M SLI
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980M SLI
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 980M SLI
2014Radeon RX 5700M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5700M better than GeForce GTX 980M SLI?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980M SLI still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 15 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 13 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 564 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 451 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 282 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 423 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 116 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980M SLI and Radeon RX 5700M

GeForce GTX 980M SLI
GeForce GTX 980M SLI
The GeForce GTX 980M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,523 points.

Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980M SLI scores 12,523 and the Radeon RX 5700M reaches 12,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980M SLI is built on Maxwell while the Radeon RX 5700M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 980M SLI) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M). Boost clocks: 1127 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,523 | 12,669+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+33% | 2304 |
| Boost Clock | 1127 MHz | 1720 MHz+53% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 980M SLI lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 980M SLI gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980M SLI) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700M) — a 140% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 384 GB/s+140% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M SLI) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (2x) (GeForce GTX 980M SLI) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980M SLI) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 (2x) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980M SLI draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 180W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon RX 5700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 980M SLI) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5700M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M SLI | Radeon RX 5700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 180W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 62.6 | 70.4+12% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













