
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅52.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 35% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 270mm, a 28mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.7 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌11.6% longer card at 270mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅52.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 35% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 270mm, a 28mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.7 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌11.6% longer card at 270mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon RX 5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 161 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 255 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 115 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon RX 5700

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700
The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon RX 5700's 14,296 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 42.1%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+42% | 14,296 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+111% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+104% | 7.949 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1725 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+6% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 5700's 180W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon RX 5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 600W (Radeon RX 5700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 270mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 180W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 600W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 270mm |
| Height | 112mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+28% | 79.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5700 launched at $379. The Radeon RX 5700 costs 5% less ($20 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 37.7 (Radeon RX 5700) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 35% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $379-5% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+35% | 37.7 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | July 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #73 | #167 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












