
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $210 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 270mm, a 110mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700 across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅23.1% more average FPS across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌124.3% HIGHER MSRP$379 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.7 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
- ❌68.8% longer card at 270mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $210 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 270mm, a 110mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅23.1% more average FPS across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700 across 28 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌124.3% HIGHER MSRP$379 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.7 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
- ❌68.8% longer card at 270mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5700 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Radeon RX 5700?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 161 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 255 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 115 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon RX 5700

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700
The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon RX 5700's 14,296 — the Radeon RX 5700 leads by 33%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 14,296+33% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 7.949 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1725 MHz+17% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 144+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 5700 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 448 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700) — a 166.7% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700) — the Radeon RX 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 448 GB/s+167% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 5700's 180W — a 88% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 600W (Radeon RX 5700). Power connectors: None vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 270mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-61% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-50% | 600W |
| Power Connector | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 270mm |
| Height | — | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+93% | 79.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5700 launched at $379. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 55.4% less ($210 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 37.7 (Radeon RX 5700) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 68.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-55% | $379 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+69% | 37.7 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 10 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | July 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #252 | #167 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












