
Arc B570
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc B570
2025Why buy it
- ✅41.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $160 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 70.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc B570 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Arc B570 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌73.1% HIGHER MSRP$379 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.7 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
Arc B570
2025Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅41.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $160 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 70.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc B570 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Arc B570 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌73.1% HIGHER MSRP$379 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.7 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5700 better than Arc B570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Arc B570 make more sense than Radeon RX 5700?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 161 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 255 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 115 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc B570 and Radeon RX 5700

Arc B570
Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.

Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700
The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Arc B570 scores 14,060 and the Radeon RX 5700 reaches 14,296 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc B570 is built on Xe2 while the Radeon RX 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Arc B570) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700). Raw compute: 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570) vs 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700). Boost clocks: 2500 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,060 | 14,296+2% |
| Architecture | Xe2 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.52 TFLOPS+45% | 7.949 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2500 MHz+45% | 1725 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+350% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc B570 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 380 GB/s (Arc B570) vs 448 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700) — a 17.9% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700. Bus width: 160-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B570) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700) — the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 380 GB/s | 448 GB/s+18% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 256-bit+60% |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+350% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B570) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media (Arc B570) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Decoder: Intel Xe Media vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700).
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc B570 draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 5700's 180W — a 18.2% difference. The Arc B570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B570) vs 600W (Radeon RX 5700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 249mm vs 270mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-17% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 600W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 249mm | 270mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 93.7+18% | 79.4 |
Value Analysis
The Arc B570 launched at $219 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5700 launched at $379. The Arc B570 costs 42.2% less ($160 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.2 (Arc B570) vs 37.7 (Radeon RX 5700) — the Arc B570 offers 70.3% better value. The Arc B570 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219-42% | $379 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.2+70% | 37.7 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 16 2025 | July 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #169 | #167 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













