G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P5000 (móvel)

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Radeon RX 5600M

2020

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Quadro P5000 (móvel)

2017

Radeon RX 5600M

2020

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro P5000 (móvel) better than Radeon RX 5600M?

Yes. Quadro P5000 (móvel) is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 9,000 vs 8,857 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Quadro P5000 (móvel) is a 2017 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon RX 5600M is a 2020 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 5600M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2017, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 16nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro P5000 (móvel) can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $2,499 MSRP. Quadro P5000 (móvel) is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Quadro P5000 (móvel) is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $2,499 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 5600M is the newer 2020 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon RX 5600M make more sense than Quadro P5000 (móvel)?

Yes. Radeon RX 5600M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro P5000 (móvel). The trade-off is that Quadro P5000 (móvel) currently gives you 1.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P5000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 5600M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro P5000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 5600M
1080p
low	132 FPS	79 FPS
medium	121 FPS	70 FPS
high	101 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	38 FPS
1440p
low	117 FPS	71 FPS
medium	103 FPS	63 FPS
high	82 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	30 FPS
4K
low	46 FPS	27 FPS
medium	42 FPS	25 FPS
high	30 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	15 FPS

Open Quadro P5000 (móvel)Open Radeon RX 5600M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro P5000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 5600M
1080p
low	233 FPS	220 FPS
medium	197 FPS	186 FPS
high	151 FPS	134 FPS
ultra	122 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	167 FPS	149 FPS
medium	138 FPS	121 FPS
high	110 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	64 FPS
4K
low	96 FPS	80 FPS
medium	78 FPS	65 FPS
high	64 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	35 FPS

Open Quadro P5000 (móvel)Open Radeon RX 5600M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro P5000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 5600M
1080p
low	405 FPS	399 FPS
medium	324 FPS	319 FPS
high	270 FPS	266 FPS
ultra	202 FPS	199 FPS
1440p
low	304 FPS	299 FPS
medium	243 FPS	239 FPS
high	202 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	152 FPS	149 FPS
4K
low	202 FPS	199 FPS
medium	162 FPS	159 FPS
high	135 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	100 FPS

Open Quadro P5000 (móvel)Open Radeon RX 5600M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro P5000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 5600M
1080p
low	227 FPS	241 FPS
medium	181 FPS	206 FPS
high	156 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	130 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	175 FPS	187 FPS
medium	139 FPS	166 FPS
high	117 FPS	134 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	111 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	104 FPS
medium	73 FPS	87 FPS
high	62 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	56 FPS

Open Quadro P5000 (móvel)Open Radeon RX 5600M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5000 (móvel) and Radeon RX 5600M

Quadro P5000 (móvel)

The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1278 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,000 points. Launch price was $1,885.

Radeon RX 5600M

The Radeon RX 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,857 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P5000 (móvel) scores 9,000 and the Radeon RX 5600M reaches 8,857 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600M). Raw compute: 6.48 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600M). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 1265 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P5000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 5600M
G3D Mark Score	9,000+2%	8,857
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	16 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2048	2304+13%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.48 TFLOPS+11%	5.829 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1582 MHz+25%	1265 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	128	144+13%
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Quadro P5000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 5600M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P5000 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600M has 6 GB. The Radeon RX 5600M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600M) — the Radeon RX 5600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P5000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 5600M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	6 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+33%	192-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600M). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P5000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 5600M
DirectX	12.1	12.1
Vulkan	1.0	1.3+30%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600M). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600M).

Feature	Quadro P5000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 5600M
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC	VCN 2.0
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	VCN 2.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P5000 (móvel) draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 5600M's 150W — a 40% difference. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 90°C.

Feature	Quadro P5000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 5600M
TDP	100W-33%	150W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C-11%	90°C
Perf/Watt	90.0+53%	59.0