
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
Radeon RX 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
2014Radeon RX 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX TITAN Black better than Radeon RX 5600M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 5600M make more sense than GeForce GTX TITAN Black?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 413 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 310 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 100 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Black and Radeon RX 5600M

GeForce GTX TITAN Black
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon RX 5600M
Radeon RX 5600M
The Radeon RX 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,857 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black scores 9,177 and the Radeon RX 5600M reaches 8,857 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600M). Raw compute: 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600M). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1265 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,177+4% | 8,857 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+25% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.645 TFLOPS | 5.829 TFLOPS+3% |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1265 MHz+29% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 240+67% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX TITAN Black gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 5600M) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Black. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600M) — the Radeon RX 5600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+17% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 5600M's 150W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600M). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 150W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-11% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 36.7 | 59.0+61% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5600M is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | — |
| Codename | GK110B | Navi 10 |
| Release | February 18 2014 | July 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #288 | #295 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













