
CMP 40HX
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 40HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 5600M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌23.3% higher power demand at 185W vs 150W.
Radeon RX 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 185W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
CMP 40HX
2021Radeon RX 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 185W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 5600M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌23.3% higher power demand at 185W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5600M better than CMP 40HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does CMP 40HX make more sense than Radeon RX 5600M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 100 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 65 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 40HX and Radeon RX 5600M

CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon RX 5600M
Radeon RX 5600M
The Radeon RX 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,857 points.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 40HX scores 8,749 and the Radeon RX 5600M reaches 8,857 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600M). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600M). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1265 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749 | 8,857+1% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS+30% | 5.829 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz+30% | 1265 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The CMP 40HX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 40HX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600M has 6 GB. The Radeon RX 5600M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600M) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600M). Decoder: No vs VCN 2.0.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | No | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the Radeon RX 5600M's 150W — a 20.9% difference. The Radeon RX 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W | 150W-19% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-11% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 59.0+25% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 40HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | — |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | July 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #302 | #295 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













