
Arc A770M
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A770M
2022Why buy it
- ✅103.6% more average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 150W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5600
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770M across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 150W vs 120W.
Arc A770M
2022Radeon RX 5600
2020Why buy it
- ✅103.6% more average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 150W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770M across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 150W vs 120W.
Quick Answers
So, is Arc A770M better than Radeon RX 5600?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5600 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A770M | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A770M | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 376 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 36 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A770M | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 267 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 400 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 132 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A770M | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 267 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 400 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770M and Radeon RX 5600

Arc A770M
Arc A770M
The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.

Radeon RX 5600
Radeon RX 5600
The Radeon RX 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1265 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,753 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the Radeon RX 5600 reaches 11,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 5600 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5600). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 5.829 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1265 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,853 | 11,753 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+78% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.79 TFLOPS+188% | 5.829 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+62% | 1265 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+78% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+433% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A770M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A770M comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600 has 6 GB. The Arc A770M offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770M) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 5600) — a 77.8% advantage for the Arc A770M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+167% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+78% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+433% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600).
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the Radeon RX 5600's 150W — a 22.2% difference. The Arc A770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-20% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 98.8+26% | 78.4 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A770M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $229 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | Navi 10 |
| Release | 2022 | July 7 2020 |
| Ranking | #225 | #295 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













