
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
2018Radeon RX 5600 OEM
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5600 OEM better than Quadro P5200 Max-Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P5200 Max-Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 22 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 415 FPS | 416 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 139 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5200 Max-Q and Radeon RX 5600 OEM

Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1316 MHz to 1569 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,308 points.

Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,333 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q scores 12,308 and the Radeon RX 5600 OEM reaches 12,333 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 5600 OEM uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Raw compute: 8.033 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Boost clocks: 1569 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,308 | 12,333 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.033 TFLOPS+26% | 6.39 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1569 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600 OEM is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5600 OEM has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 5600 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600 OEM) — the Radeon RX 5600 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 5600 OEM's 150W — a 40% difference. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-33% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 123.1+50% | 82.2 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













