Quadro P620 vs Radeon RX 560

NVIDIA

Quadro P620

2018Core: 1177 MHzBoost: 1443 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 560

2017Core: 1175 MHzBoost: 1275 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P620

2018

Why buy it

  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX 560: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX 560 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
  • Draws 40W instead of 75W, a 35W reduction.
  • Measures 145mm instead of 170mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 71.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $170 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.8 vs 37.2 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon RX 560

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $71 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
  • Delivers 71% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 87.5% higher power demand at 75W vs 40W.
  • 17.2% longer card at 170mm vs 145mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro P620 better than Radeon RX 560?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,698 vs 3,682 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro P620 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (40W vs 75W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P620 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2018 generation instead of 2017 and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro P620 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro P620 is about 71.7% more expensive on MSRP at $170 MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and you are getting 0.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 560 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon RX 560 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon RX 560 is 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 3,682 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro P620Radeon RX 560
1080p
low48 FPS41 FPS
medium29 FPS26 FPS
high21 FPS20 FPS
ultra10 FPS11 FPS
1440p
low32 FPS28 FPS
medium19 FPS17 FPS
high10 FPS10 FPS
ultra5 FPS5 FPS
4K
low10 FPS10 FPS
medium7 FPS7 FPS
high4 FPS4 FPS
ultra3 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro P620Radeon RX 560
1080p
low73 FPS88 FPS
medium46 FPS58 FPS
high34 FPS43 FPS
ultra21 FPS25 FPS
1440p
low21 FPS42 FPS
medium15 FPS31 FPS
high11 FPS22 FPS
ultra8 FPS15 FPS
4K
low6 FPS11 FPS
medium4 FPS9 FPS
high4 FPS8 FPS
ultra3 FPS5 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro P620Radeon RX 560
1080p
low166 FPS166 FPS
medium133 FPS133 FPS
high111 FPS110 FPS
ultra83 FPS83 FPS
1440p
low125 FPS124 FPS
medium100 FPS99 FPS
high83 FPS83 FPS
ultra62 FPS62 FPS
4K
low83 FPS83 FPS
medium67 FPS66 FPS
high55 FPS55 FPS
ultra42 FPS41 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro P620Radeon RX 560
1080p
low147 FPS154 FPS
medium113 FPS119 FPS
high91 FPS97 FPS
ultra76 FPS81 FPS
1440p
low105 FPS110 FPS
medium83 FPS87 FPS
high67 FPS72 FPS
ultra52 FPS58 FPS
4K
low61 FPS62 FPS
medium47 FPS47 FPS
high36 FPS36 FPS
ultra25 FPS27 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P620 and Radeon RX 560

NVIDIA

Quadro P620

The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 560

The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P620 scores 3,698 and the Radeon RX 560 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P620 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Quadro P620) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560). Raw compute: 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560). Boost clocks: 1443 MHz vs 1275 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon RX 560
G3D Mark Score
3,698
3,682
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 4.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
512
1024+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.478 TFLOPS
2.611 TFLOPS+77%
Boost Clock
1443 MHz+13%
1275 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
64+100%
L1 Cache
192 KB
256 KB+33%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P620 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon RX 560
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P620 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 560 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon RX 560
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon RX 560
DirectX
12 (FL12_1)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560). Decoder: NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560).

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon RX 560
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
VCE 3.4
Decoder
NVDEC
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P620 draws 40W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P620) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 145mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70 C.

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon RX 560
TDP
40W-47%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
145mm
170mm
Height
69mm
112mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
70 C
Perf/Watt
92.5+88%
49.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P620 launched at $170 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560 launched at $99. The Radeon RX 560 costs 41.8% less ($71 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.8 (Quadro P620) vs 37.2 (Radeon RX 560) — the Radeon RX 560 offers 70.6% better value. The Quadro P620 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon RX 560
MSRP
$170
$99-42%
Performance per Dollar
21.8
37.2+71%
Codename
GP107
Polaris 21
Release
February 1 2018
April 18 2017
Ranking
#524
#527