
Quadro P620
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P620
2018Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX 560: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX 560 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 75W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 170mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌71.7% HIGHER MSRP$170 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.8 vs 37.2 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Radeon RX 560
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 71% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 75W vs 40W.
- ❌17.2% longer card at 170mm vs 145mm.
Quadro P620
2018Radeon RX 560
2017Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon RX 560: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon RX 560 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 75W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 170mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 71% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌71.7% HIGHER MSRP$170 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.8 vs 37.2 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 75W vs 40W.
- ❌17.2% longer card at 170mm vs 145mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P620 better than Radeon RX 560?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 560 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 21 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P620 and Radeon RX 560

Quadro P620
Quadro P620
The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

Radeon RX 560
Radeon RX 560
The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P620 scores 3,698 and the Radeon RX 560 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P620 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Quadro P620) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560). Raw compute: 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560). Boost clocks: 1443 MHz vs 1275 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,698 | 3,682 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1024+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.478 TFLOPS | 2.611 TFLOPS+77% |
| Boost Clock | 1443 MHz+13% | 1275 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P620 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P620 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 560 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560). Decoder: NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560).
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P620 draws 40W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P620) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 145mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70 C.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-47% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 145mm | 170mm |
| Height | 69mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70 C |
| Perf/Watt | 92.5+88% | 49.1 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P620 launched at $170 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560 launched at $99. The Radeon RX 560 costs 41.8% less ($71 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.8 (Quadro P620) vs 37.2 (Radeon RX 560) — the Radeon RX 560 offers 70.6% better value. The Quadro P620 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $170 | $99-42% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.8 | 37.2+71% |
| Codename | GP107 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | February 1 2018 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #524 | #527 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












