G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅162.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.

Radeon RX 560

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
✅Measures 170mm instead of 173mm, a 3mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Radeon RX 560

2017

Why buy it

✅162.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
✅Measures 170mm instead of 173mm, a 3mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon RX 560?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce GTX 1060 averages 162.0% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 10,064 vs 3,682 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon RX 560 is a 2017 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 173.3% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1060 is about 151.5% more expensive on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and you are getting 162.0% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 173.3% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 560 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Radeon RX 560 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?

Yes. Radeon RX 560 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 180W), and staying closer to $99 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1060. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1060 currently gives you 173.3% higher G3D Mark and 162.0% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 8.7%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 560 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 560
1080p
low	117 FPS	41 FPS
medium	105 FPS	26 FPS
high	91 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	11 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	28 FPS
medium	87 FPS	17 FPS
high	76 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	10 FPS
medium	49 FPS	7 FPS
high	41 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 560

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 560
1080p
low	216 FPS	88 FPS
medium	181 FPS	58 FPS
high	148 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	25 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	42 FPS
medium	107 FPS	31 FPS
high	87 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	15 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	11 FPS
medium	51 FPS	9 FPS
high	49 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	5 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 560

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 560
1080p
low	453 FPS	166 FPS
medium	362 FPS	133 FPS
high	302 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	83 FPS
1440p
low	340 FPS	124 FPS
medium	272 FPS	99 FPS
high	226 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	226 FPS	83 FPS
medium	181 FPS	66 FPS
high	151 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	41 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 560

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 560
1080p
low	358 FPS	154 FPS
medium	302 FPS	119 FPS
high	260 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	110 FPS
medium	254 FPS	87 FPS
high	208 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	62 FPS
medium	133 FPS	47 FPS
high	123 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	27 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 560

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon RX 560

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 560

The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon RX 560's 3,682 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 173.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1275 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 560
G3D Mark Score	10,064+173%	3,682
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Process Node	16 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2560+150%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS+240%	2.611 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+36%	1275 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	160+150%	64
L1 Cache	960 KB+275%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 560 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 560
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 560
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 560
DirectX	12	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 560
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	VCE 3.4
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The Radeon RX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: 6-pin vs None. Card length: 173mm vs 170mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 560
TDP	180W	75W-58%
Recommended PSU	400W-11%	450W
Power Connector	6-pin	None
Length	173mm	170mm
Height	111mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	—	70 C
Perf/Watt	55.9+14%	49.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560 launched at $99. The Radeon RX 560 costs 60.2% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 37.2 (Radeon RX 560) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 8.6% better value. The Radeon RX 560 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).