
FirePro S7150
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro S7150
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌2323.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,399 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 37.2 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
Radeon RX 560
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,300 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2266.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than FirePro S7150: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro S7150 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
FirePro S7150
2016Radeon RX 560
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,300 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2266.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than FirePro S7150: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro S7150 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌2323.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,399 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 37.2 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro S7150 better than Radeon RX 560?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 560 make more sense than FirePro S7150?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro S7150 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro S7150 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro S7150 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro S7150 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S7150 and Radeon RX 560

FirePro S7150
FirePro S7150
The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

Radeon RX 560
Radeon RX 560
The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S7150 scores 3,770 and the Radeon RX 560 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7150 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro S7150) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560). Raw compute: 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560).
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,770+2% | 3,682 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.768 TFLOPS+44% | 2.611 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro S7150 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro S7150) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560) — the Radeon RX 560 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S7150) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro S7150) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (FirePro S7150) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560).
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 5.0 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S7150 draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7150) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70 C.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 241mm | 170mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70 C |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1 | 49.1+96% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S7150 launched at $2399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560 launched at $99. The Radeon RX 560 costs 95.9% less ($2300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (FirePro S7150) vs 37.2 (Radeon RX 560) — the Radeon RX 560 offers 2225% better value. The Radeon RX 560 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2399 | $99-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.6 | 37.2+2225% |
| Codename | Tonga | Polaris 21 |
| Release | February 1 2016 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #521 | #527 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












