FirePro S7150 vs Radeon RX 560

FirePro S7150

2016Core: 920 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 560

2017Core: 1175 MHzBoost: 1275 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro S7150

2016

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 2323.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,399 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 37.2 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Radeon RX 560

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,300 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 2266.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Less risky long-term buy than FirePro S7150: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro S7150 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
  • Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro S7150 better than Radeon RX 560?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,770 vs 3,682 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer FirePro S7150 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 560 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2017 generation instead of 2016, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 14nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
FirePro S7150 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. FirePro S7150 is about 2323.2% more expensive on MSRP at $2,399 MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and you are getting 2.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 560 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon RX 560 make more sense than FirePro S7150?
Yes. Radeon RX 560 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 150W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $99 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of FirePro S7150. The trade-off is that FirePro S7150 currently gives you 2.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 560 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetFirePro S7150Radeon RX 560
1080p
low104 FPS41 FPS
medium89 FPS26 FPS
high73 FPS20 FPS
ultra43 FPS11 FPS
1440p
low91 FPS28 FPS
medium80 FPS17 FPS
high58 FPS10 FPS
ultra33 FPS5 FPS
4K
low29 FPS10 FPS
medium27 FPS7 FPS
high18 FPS4 FPS
ultra16 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetFirePro S7150Radeon RX 560
1080p
low143 FPS88 FPS
medium115 FPS58 FPS
high93 FPS43 FPS
ultra68 FPS25 FPS
1440p
low84 FPS42 FPS
medium61 FPS31 FPS
high47 FPS22 FPS
ultra35 FPS15 FPS
4K
low34 FPS11 FPS
medium24 FPS9 FPS
high19 FPS8 FPS
ultra14 FPS5 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetFirePro S7150Radeon RX 560
1080p
low170 FPS166 FPS
medium136 FPS133 FPS
high113 FPS110 FPS
ultra85 FPS83 FPS
1440p
low127 FPS124 FPS
medium102 FPS99 FPS
high85 FPS83 FPS
ultra64 FPS62 FPS
4K
low85 FPS83 FPS
medium68 FPS66 FPS
high57 FPS55 FPS
ultra42 FPS41 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetFirePro S7150Radeon RX 560
1080p
low170 FPS154 FPS
medium136 FPS119 FPS
high113 FPS97 FPS
ultra85 FPS81 FPS
1440p
low127 FPS110 FPS
medium102 FPS87 FPS
high85 FPS72 FPS
ultra64 FPS58 FPS
4K
low76 FPS62 FPS
medium58 FPS47 FPS
high47 FPS36 FPS
ultra31 FPS27 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S7150 and Radeon RX 560

AMD

FirePro S7150

The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

AMD

Radeon RX 560

The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S7150 scores 3,770 and the Radeon RX 560 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7150 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro S7150) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560). Raw compute: 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560).

FeatureFirePro S7150Radeon RX 560
G3D Mark Score
3,770+2%
3,682
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+100%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.768 TFLOPS+44%
2.611 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+100%
64
L1 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 560 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro S7150 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureFirePro S7150Radeon RX 560
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro S7150) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560) — the Radeon RX 560 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S7150Radeon RX 560
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S7150) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro S7150Radeon RX 560
DirectX
12
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro S7150) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (FirePro S7150) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560).

FeatureFirePro S7150Radeon RX 560
Encoder
VCE 3.0
VCE 3.4
Decoder
UVD 5.0
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,H.265
HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7150 draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7150) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70 C.

FeatureFirePro S7150Radeon RX 560
TDP
150W
75W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
241mm
170mm
Height
111mm
112mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
70 C
Perf/Watt
25.1
49.1+96%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro S7150 launched at $2399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560 launched at $99. The Radeon RX 560 costs 95.9% less ($2300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (FirePro S7150) vs 37.2 (Radeon RX 560) — the Radeon RX 560 offers 2225% better value. The Radeon RX 560 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureFirePro S7150Radeon RX 560
MSRP
$2399
$99-96%
Performance per Dollar
1.6
37.2+2225%
Codename
Tonga
Polaris 21
Release
February 1 2016
April 18 2017
Ranking
#521
#527