
GRID P40-4Q
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID P40-4Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌164.7% higher power demand at 225W vs 85W.
Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 225W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
GRID P40-4Q
2013Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 225W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌164.7% higher power demand at 225W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5500M better than GRID P40-4Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID P40-4Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 64 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 53 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-4Q and Radeon RX 5500M

GRID P40-4Q
GRID P40-4Q
The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.

Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M
The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-4Q scores 5,926 and the Radeon RX 5500M reaches 5,954 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-4Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M).
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,926 | 5,954 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+9% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+102% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+45% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GRID P40-4Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID P40-4Q) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 5500M) — the Radeon RX 5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID P40-4Q) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5500M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-4Q draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 85W — a 90.3% difference. The Radeon RX 5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-4Q) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 85W-62% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 26.3 | 70.0+166% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5500M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID P40-4Q | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | — |
| Codename | GK104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #628 | #400 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













