
GeForce MX570
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX570
2022Why buy it
- ✅6.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 85W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌240% higher power demand at 85W vs 25W.
GeForce MX570
2022Radeon RX 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅6.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 85W, a 60W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌240% higher power demand at 85W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5500M better than GeForce MX570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce MX570 make more sense than Radeon RX 5500M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 64 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 53 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 and Radeon RX 5500M

GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570
The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.

Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M
The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 scores 5,738 and the Radeon RX 5500M reaches 5,954 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,738 | 5,954+4% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+45% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+2% | 4.632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1645 MHz+42% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 88+38% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce MX570 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce MX570 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5500M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500M) — a 133.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 224 GB/s+133% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 draws 25W versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 85W — a 109.1% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5500M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-71% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 229.5+228% | 70.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | — |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 14 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #407 | #400 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













