GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) vs Radeon RX 5500M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

2020Core: 1350 MHzBoost: 1485 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 5500M

2019Core: 1375 MHzBoost: 1645 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Radeon RX 5500M

2019

Why buy it

  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 5500M better than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,918 vs 5,954 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon RX 5500M is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 5500M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a 7nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon RX 5500M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Radeon RX 5500M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon RX 5500M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.6% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is the newer 2020 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (50W vs 85W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) make more sense than Radeon RX 5500M?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 85W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon RX 5500M. The trade-off is that Radeon RX 5500M currently gives you 0.6% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Radeon RX 5500M
1080p
low90 FPS92 FPS
medium80 FPS83 FPS
high67 FPS68 FPS
ultra55 FPS56 FPS
1440p
low83 FPS86 FPS
medium71 FPS75 FPS
high56 FPS59 FPS
ultra46 FPS49 FPS
4K
low39 FPS42 FPS
medium36 FPS39 FPS
high25 FPS27 FPS
ultra22 FPS24 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Radeon RX 5500M
1080p
low144 FPS128 FPS
medium122 FPS96 FPS
high103 FPS68 FPS
ultra72 FPS45 FPS
1440p
low85 FPS84 FPS
medium67 FPS58 FPS
high52 FPS43 FPS
ultra38 FPS32 FPS
4K
low37 FPS38 FPS
medium28 FPS29 FPS
high22 FPS23 FPS
ultra17 FPS17 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Radeon RX 5500M
1080p
low266 FPS268 FPS
medium213 FPS214 FPS
high178 FPS179 FPS
ultra133 FPS134 FPS
1440p
low200 FPS201 FPS
medium160 FPS161 FPS
high133 FPS134 FPS
ultra100 FPS100 FPS
4K
low133 FPS134 FPS
medium107 FPS107 FPS
high89 FPS89 FPS
ultra67 FPS64 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Radeon RX 5500M
1080p
low256 FPS262 FPS
medium205 FPS204 FPS
high176 FPS174 FPS
ultra133 FPS134 FPS
1440p
low196 FPS201 FPS
medium155 FPS161 FPS
high127 FPS130 FPS
ultra100 FPS100 FPS
4K
low96 FPS97 FPS
medium73 FPS75 FPS
high64 FPS66 FPS
ultra50 FPS53 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) and Radeon RX 5500M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,918 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 5500M

The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) scores 5,918 and the Radeon RX 5500M reaches 5,954 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 1645 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Radeon RX 5500M
G3D Mark Score
5,918
5,954
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
12 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1024
1408+38%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.041 TFLOPS
4.632 TFLOPS+52%
Boost Clock
1485 MHz
1645 MHz+11%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
88+38%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5500M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Radeon RX 5500M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500M) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 5500M) — the Radeon RX 5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Radeon RX 5500M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
224 GB/s+100%
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Radeon RX 5500M
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500M). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Radeon RX 5500M
Encoder
NVENC (6th Gen)
VCN 2.0
Decoder
NVDEC (3rd Gen)
VCN 2.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 85W — a 51.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Radeon RX 5500M
TDP
50W-41%
85W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
118.4+69%
70.0