
Quadro P2200
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P2200
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5500 XT across 15 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌115.6% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
Radeon RX 5500 XT
2019Why buy it
- ✅32.8% more average FPS across 15 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 108.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.6 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 5 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.
Quadro P2200
2019Radeon RX 5500 XT
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅32.8% more average FPS across 15 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 108.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.6 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 5 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5500 XT across 15 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌115.6% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5500 XT better than Quadro P2200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P2200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 333 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 102 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 88 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2200 and Radeon RX 5500 XT

Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200
The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

Radeon RX 5500 XT
Radeon RX 5500 XT
The Radeon RX 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 12 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,080 points. Launch price was $169.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2200 scores 9,386 and the Radeon RX 5500 XT reaches 9,080 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 5500 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P2200) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Raw compute: 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Boost clocks: 1493 MHz vs 1845 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,386+3% | 9,080 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1408+10% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.822 TFLOPS | 5.196 TFLOPS+36% |
| Boost Clock | 1493 MHz | 1845 MHz+24% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 88+10% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 2 MB+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P2200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P2200 comes with 5 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5500 XT has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 5500 XT offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 5500 XT) — the Radeon RX 5500 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 5 GB | 8 GB+60% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 2 MB+60% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P2200) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500 XT).
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2200 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 5500 XT's 130W — a 53.7% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P2200) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 201mm vs 180mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-42% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 201mm | 180mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 125.1+79% | 69.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P2200 launched at $429 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5500 XT launched at $199. The Radeon RX 5500 XT costs 53.6% less ($230 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.9 (Quadro P2200) vs 45.6 (Radeon RX 5500 XT) — the Radeon RX 5500 XT offers 108.2% better value.
| Feature | Quadro P2200 | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429 | $199-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.9 | 45.6+108% |
| Codename | GP106 | Navi 14 |
| Release | June 10 2019 | December 12 2019 |
| Ranking | #281 | #291 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













