
Quadro P3200
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P3200
2018Why buy it
- ✅51.3% more average FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 110W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌179.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 49.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $321 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 187.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3200 across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌46.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 75W.
Quadro P3200
2018Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅51.3% more average FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 110W, a 35W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $321 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 187.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌179.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 49.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3200 across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌46.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5500 better than Quadro P3200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P3200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 74 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3200 and Radeon RX 5500

Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.

Radeon RX 5500
Radeon RX 5500
The Radeon RX 5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,837 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3200 scores 8,578 and the Radeon RX 5500 reaches 8,837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 5500 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P3200) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500). Raw compute: 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500). Boost clocks: 1543 MHz vs 1845 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,578 | 8,837+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+27% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.53 TFLOPS+6% | 5.196 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1543 MHz | 1845 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+27% | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P3200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro P3200) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264 (Quadro P3200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.265,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3200 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 5500's 110W — a 37.8% difference. The Quadro P3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P3200) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 180mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-32% | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 180mm |
| Height | 0mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 114.4+42% | 80.3 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P3200 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5500 launched at $179. The Radeon RX 5500 costs 64.2% less ($321 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.2 (Quadro P3200) vs 49.4 (Radeon RX 5500) — the Radeon RX 5500 offers 187.2% better value. The Radeon RX 5500 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $179-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.2 | 49.4+187% |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #304 | #297 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












