
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1575.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 49.4 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌240.9% higher power demand at 375W vs 110W.
Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,820 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1580.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 375W, a 265W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,820 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1580.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 375W, a 265W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1575.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 49.4 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌240.9% higher power demand at 375W vs 110W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5500 better than GeForce GTX TITAN Z?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX TITAN Z still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 74 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Z and Radeon RX 5500

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.

Radeon RX 5500
Radeon RX 5500
The Radeon RX 5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,837 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 and the Radeon RX 5500 reaches 8,837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 5500 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1845 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,811 | 8,837 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5760 ×2+309% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 | 5.196 TFLOPS+3% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1845 MHz+111% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+173% | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX TITAN Z gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5500 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500) — a 1400.9% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s x2+50% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2+200% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5500). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.2+20% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the Radeon RX 5500's 110W — a 109.3% difference. The Radeon RX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5500). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 180mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 110W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 450W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 180mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 23.5 | 80.3+242% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5500 launched at $179. The Radeon RX 5500 costs 94% less ($2820 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 49.4 (Radeon RX 5500) — the Radeon RX 5500 offers 1603.4% better value. The Radeon RX 5500 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $179-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9 | 49.4+1603% |
| Codename | GK110B | Navi 14 |
| Release | May 28 2014 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #300 | #297 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













