
CMP 40HX
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 40HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 5500 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌290.5% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 49.4 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌68.2% higher power demand at 185W vs 110W.
Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $520 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 294.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 185W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
CMP 40HX
2021Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $520 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 294.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 185W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 5500 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌290.5% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 49.4 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌68.2% higher power demand at 185W vs 110W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5500 better than CMP 40HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does CMP 40HX make more sense than Radeon RX 5500?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 74 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 40HX and Radeon RX 5500

CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon RX 5500
Radeon RX 5500
The Radeon RX 5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,837 points.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 40HX scores 8,749 and the Radeon RX 5500 reaches 8,837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5500 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1845 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749 | 8,837+1% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+64% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS+46% | 5.196 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 1845 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+64% | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The CMP 40HX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5500). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500). Decoder: No vs VCN 2.0.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | No | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the Radeon RX 5500's 110W — a 50.8% difference. The Radeon RX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 180mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W | 110W-41% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 180mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 80.3+70% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 40HX launched at $699 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5500 launched at $179. The Radeon RX 5500 costs 74.4% less ($520 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 49.4 (Radeon RX 5500) — the Radeon RX 5500 offers 295.2% better value. The CMP 40HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $179-74% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 49.4+295% |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 14 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #302 | #297 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













