
Radeon Pro WX 4150
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro WX 4150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌279.7% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 33.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
Radeon RX 550
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $221 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 284.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 4150: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 4150 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Pro WX 4150
2017Radeon RX 550
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $221 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 284.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 4150: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 4150 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌279.7% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 33.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 550 better than Radeon Pro WX 4150?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 4150 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 30 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 22 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Radeon RX 550

Radeon Pro WX 4150
Radeon Pro WX 4150
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.

Radeon RX 550
Radeon RX 550
The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 scores 2,642 and the Radeon RX 550 reaches 2,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550). Raw compute: 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550). Boost clocks: 1053 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,642 | 2,674+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+75% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.887 TFLOPS+56% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | 1183 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+75% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB+75% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 550 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 550).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 550's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 155mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8 | 53.5+1% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 550 launched at $79. The Radeon RX 550 costs 73.7% less ($221 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.8 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 33.8 (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon RX 550 offers 284.1% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $79-74% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.8 | 33.8+284% |
| Codename | Baffin | Lexa |
| Release | March 1 2017 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #620 | #617 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













