Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Radeon RX 550

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2017Core: 1002 MHzBoost: 1053 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 550

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2017

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 279.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 33.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

Radeon RX 550

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $221 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 284.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 4150: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 4150 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 550 better than Radeon Pro WX 4150?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 2,642 vs 2,674 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon RX 550 is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 550 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon RX 550 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $79 MSRP. Radeon RX 550 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon RX 550 is about $221 cheaper on MSRP at $79 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 1.2% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $79 MSRP gets you and FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation.
Is Radeon Pro WX 4150 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon Pro WX 4150 is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $300 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Radeon RX 550 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon Pro WX 4150Radeon RX 550
1080p
low50 FPS40 FPS
medium33 FPS26 FPS
high23 FPS19 FPS
ultra11 FPS10 FPS
1440p
low34 FPS28 FPS
medium21 FPS17 FPS
high11 FPS9 FPS
ultra6 FPS5 FPS
4K
low11 FPS10 FPS
medium7 FPS6 FPS
high4 FPS4 FPS
ultra3 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon Pro WX 4150Radeon RX 550
1080p
low68 FPS76 FPS
medium40 FPS47 FPS
high28 FPS35 FPS
ultra17 FPS21 FPS
1440p
low33 FPS23 FPS
medium21 FPS17 FPS
high13 FPS12 FPS
ultra9 FPS8 FPS
4K
low9 FPS6 FPS
medium6 FPS4 FPS
high5 FPS4 FPS
ultra3 FPS2 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon Pro WX 4150Radeon RX 550
1080p
low119 FPS120 FPS
medium95 FPS96 FPS
high79 FPS80 FPS
ultra59 FPS60 FPS
1440p
low89 FPS90 FPS
medium71 FPS72 FPS
high59 FPS60 FPS
ultra45 FPS45 FPS
4K
low59 FPS60 FPS
medium48 FPS48 FPS
high40 FPS40 FPS
ultra30 FPS30 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon Pro WX 4150Radeon RX 550
1080p
low119 FPS120 FPS
medium95 FPS96 FPS
high79 FPS80 FPS
ultra59 FPS60 FPS
1440p
low89 FPS90 FPS
medium71 FPS72 FPS
high59 FPS60 FPS
ultra45 FPS45 FPS
4K
low59 FPS54 FPS
medium48 FPS41 FPS
high40 FPS32 FPS
ultra30 FPS22 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Radeon RX 550

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 4150

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 550

The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 scores 2,642 and the Radeon RX 550 reaches 2,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550). Raw compute: 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550). Boost clocks: 1053 MHz vs 1183 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4150Radeon RX 550
G3D Mark Score
2,642
2,674+1%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
896+75%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.887 TFLOPS+56%
1.211 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1053 MHz
1183 MHz+12%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
56+75%
32
L1 Cache
224 KB+75%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 550 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4150Radeon RX 550
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4150Radeon RX 550
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4150Radeon RX 550
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12_0
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 550).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4150Radeon RX 550
Encoder
VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
VCE 3.4
Decoder
UVD 6.3
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 550's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4150Radeon RX 550
TDP
50W
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
155mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
52.8
53.5+1%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 550 launched at $79. The Radeon RX 550 costs 73.7% less ($221 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.8 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) vs 33.8 (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon RX 550 offers 284.1% better value.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 4150Radeon RX 550
MSRP
$300
$79-74%
Performance per Dollar
8.8
33.8+284%
Codename
Baffin
Lexa
Release
March 1 2017
April 20 2017
Ranking
#620
#617