
Radeon HD 8770
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 8770
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌89.9% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.4 vs 33.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
Radeon RX 550
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 17.4 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 8770: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 8770 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon HD 8770
2013Radeon RX 550
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 17.4 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 8770: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 8770 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌89.9% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.4 vs 33.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 550 better than Radeon HD 8770?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 8770 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 15 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 8 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 30 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 22 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8770 and Radeon RX 550

Radeon HD 8770
Radeon HD 8770
The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.

Radeon RX 550
Radeon RX 550
The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8770 scores 2,607 and the Radeon RX 550 reaches 2,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8770 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon HD 8770) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550). Raw compute: 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550). Boost clocks: 825 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,607 | 2,674+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6336 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+91% |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | 1183 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 128 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 550 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon HD 8770 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8770 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 550 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 550 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (Radeon HD 8770) vs 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 550) — a 16.7% advantage for the Radeon RX 550. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 8770) vs 512 KB (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon RX 550 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 112 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon HD 8770) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon HD 8770) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8770 draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 550's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8770) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 240mm vs 155mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 240mm | 155mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 52.1 | 53.5+3% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8770 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 550 launched at $79. The Radeon RX 550 costs 47.3% less ($71 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.4 (Radeon HD 8770) vs 33.8 (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon RX 550 offers 94.3% better value. The Radeon RX 550 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8770 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $79-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.4 | 33.8+94% |
| Codename | Mars | Lexa |
| Release | April 1 2013 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #844 | #617 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













