
FirePro R5000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro R5000
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1291.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,099 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 33.8 G3D/$ ($1,099 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 550
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,020 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1305.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than FirePro R5000: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro R5000 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
FirePro R5000
2013Radeon RX 550
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,020 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1305.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than FirePro R5000: it remains the more sensible modern option while FirePro R5000 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1291.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,099 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 33.8 G3D/$ ($1,099 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 550 better than FirePro R5000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is FirePro R5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro R5000 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro R5000 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro R5000 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 30 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro R5000 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 22 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro R5000 and Radeon RX 550

FirePro R5000
FirePro R5000
The FirePro R5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,647 points. Launch price was $1,099.

Radeon RX 550
Radeon RX 550
The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro R5000 scores 2,647 and the Radeon RX 550 reaches 2,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro R5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro R5000) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro R5000) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,647 | 2,674+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.267 TFLOPS+5% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 550 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro R5000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro R5000) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro R5000) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro R5000) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 550).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro R5000 draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 550's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro R5000) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 279mm vs 155mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 279mm | 155mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 17.6 | 53.5+204% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro R5000 launched at $1099 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 550 launched at $79. The Radeon RX 550 costs 92.8% less ($1020 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (FirePro R5000) vs 33.8 (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon RX 550 offers 1308.3% better value. The Radeon RX 550 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1099 | $79-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.4 | 33.8+1308% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Lexa |
| Release | February 25 2013 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #619 | #617 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













