
GRID P40-8Q
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID P40-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2225.6% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 59.0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.
Radeon RX 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,871 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2256.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
GRID P40-8Q
2015Radeon RX 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,871 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2256.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2225.6% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 59.0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5300 better than GRID P40-8Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID P40-8Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 21 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 74 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-8Q and Radeon RX 5300

GRID P40-8Q
GRID P40-8Q
The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.

Radeon RX 5300
Radeon RX 5300
The Radeon RX 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,606 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-8Q scores 7,507 and the Radeon RX 5300 reaches 7,606 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 5300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-8Q) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,507 | 7,606+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+45% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+4% | 4.632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1645 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+45% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5300 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GRID P40-8Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P40-8Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5300 has 3 GB. The GRID P40-8Q offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P40-8Q) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300) — the GRID P40-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5300). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5300). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 5300).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 5300's 100W — a 76.9% difference. The Radeon RX 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 180mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 100W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 180mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 33.4 | 76.1+128% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-8Q launched at $3000 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5300 launched at $129. The Radeon RX 5300 costs 95.7% less ($2871 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 59.0 (Radeon RX 5300) — the Radeon RX 5300 offers 2260% better value. The Radeon RX 5300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $129-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 59.0+2260% |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 14 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #505 | #336 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












