
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 480
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1209.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 375W vs 150W.
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,770 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1170.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 375W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,770 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1170.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 375W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1209.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 375W vs 150W.
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX TITAN Z better than Radeon RX 480?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 480 make more sense than GeForce GTX TITAN Z?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 96 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 62 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Z and Radeon RX 480

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.

Radeon RX 480
Radeon RX 480
The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 and the Radeon RX 480 reaches 8,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 480). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1266 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,811+3% | 8,546 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 5760 ×2+150% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 | 5.834 TFLOPS+16% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1266 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+67% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 576 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 480 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 480 has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 480) — a 1213.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s x2+31% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 480). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 480).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the Radeon RX 480's 150W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon RX 480 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 500W (Radeon RX 480). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 150W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 95mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 23.5 | 57.0+143% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 480 launched at $229. The Radeon RX 480 costs 92.4% less ($2770 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 offers 1186.2% better value. The Radeon RX 480 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $229-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9 | 37.3+1186% |
| Codename | GK110B | Ellesmere |
| Release | May 28 2014 | June 29 2016 |
| Ranking | #300 | #305 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













