
GeForce GTX Titan
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 480
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX Titan
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 480 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌336.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅9.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $770 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 355.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX Titan
2013Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅9.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $770 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 355.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 480 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌336.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 480 better than GeForce GTX Titan?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX Titan make more sense than Radeon RX 480?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 96 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 53 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX Titan and Radeon RX 480

GeForce GTX Titan
GeForce GTX Titan
The GeForce GTX Titan is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 19 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,181 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon RX 480
Radeon RX 480
The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX Titan scores 8,181 and the Radeon RX 480 reaches 8,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX Titan is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,688 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 480). Raw compute: 4.709 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1266 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,181 | 8,546+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2688+17% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.709 TFLOPS | 5.834 TFLOPS+24% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1266 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 224+56% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 576 KB+157% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX Titan gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 480 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX Titan comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 480 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 480 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 480) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce GTX Titan. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+13% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 480). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX Titan) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 480).
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX Titan draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 480's 150W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX 480 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 500W (Radeon RX 480). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 150W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 95mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 32.7 | 57.0+74% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX Titan launched at $999 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 480 launched at $229. The Radeon RX 480 costs 77.1% less ($770 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.2 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 offers 354.9% better value. The Radeon RX 480 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $229-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2 | 37.3+355% |
| Codename | GK110 | Ellesmere |
| Release | February 19 2013 | June 29 2016 |
| Ranking | #311 | #305 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












