
CMP 40HX
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 480
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 40HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌205.2% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌23.3% higher power demand at 185W vs 150W.
Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 198.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 185W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
CMP 40HX
2021Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 198.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 185W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌205.2% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌23.3% higher power demand at 185W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is CMP 40HX better than Radeon RX 480?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 480 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 96 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 62 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 40HX and Radeon RX 480

CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon RX 480
Radeon RX 480
The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 40HX scores 8,749 and the Radeon RX 480 reaches 8,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 480). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1266 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749+2% | 8,546 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS+30% | 5.834 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz+30% | 1266 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+311% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 40HX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 480 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 480 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 480) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 480). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480). Decoder: No vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | No | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the Radeon RX 480's 150W — a 20.9% difference. The Radeon RX 480 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 500W (Radeon RX 480). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W | 150W-19% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 95mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 57.0+21% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 40HX launched at $699 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 480 launched at $229. The Radeon RX 480 costs 67.2% less ($470 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 480) — the Radeon RX 480 offers 198.4% better value. The CMP 40HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | Radeon RX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $229-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 37.3+198% |
| Codename | TU106 | Ellesmere |
| Release | February 25 2021 | June 29 2016 |
| Ranking | #302 | #305 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













