
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M395
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
2012Why buy it
- ✅1.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M395
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN (2012−2015) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
2012Radeon R9 M395
2015Why buy it
- ✅1.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN (2012−2015) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire better than Radeon R9 M395?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R9 M395 make more sense than Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 17 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire and Radeon R9 M395

Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2012. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Radeon R9 M395
Radeon R9 M395
The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire scores 5,000 and the Radeon R9 M395 reaches 4,934 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is built on GCN while the Radeon R9 M395 uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000+1% | 4,934 |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 153.6 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395) — a 14.6% advantage for the Radeon R9 M395. Bus width: 256-bit x2 vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s x2 | 176 GB/s+15% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit x2 | 256-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 M395's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon R9 M395 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 75W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 25.0 | 65.8+163% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M395 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Codename | Wimbledon XT | — |
| Release | May 1 2012 | June 9 2015 |
| Ranking | #395 | #445 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













