Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs Radeon R9 M395

AMD

Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire

2012Core: 850 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M395

2015Core: 834 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire

2012

Why buy it

  • 1.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M395

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN (2012−2015) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire better than Radeon R9 M395?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire averages 1.1% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,000 vs 4,934 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 1.1% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.3% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 M395 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon R9 M395 make more sense than Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire?
Yes. Radeon R9 M395 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 200W), and staying closer to $300 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire. The trade-off is that Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire currently gives you 1.3% higher G3D Mark and 1.1% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Radeon R9 M395 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon HD 7970M CrossfireRadeon R9 M395
1080p
low77 FPS77 FPS
medium63 FPS63 FPS
high49 FPS49 FPS
ultra32 FPS32 FPS
1440p
low67 FPS67 FPS
medium54 FPS54 FPS
high38 FPS38 FPS
ultra24 FPS24 FPS
4K
low24 FPS24 FPS
medium23 FPS23 FPS
high15 FPS15 FPS
ultra13 FPS13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon HD 7970M CrossfireRadeon R9 M395
1080p
low89 FPS84 FPS
medium61 FPS58 FPS
high45 FPS42 FPS
ultra29 FPS27 FPS
1440p
low50 FPS48 FPS
medium30 FPS28 FPS
high21 FPS20 FPS
ultra15 FPS14 FPS
4K
low17 FPS16 FPS
medium11 FPS10 FPS
high9 FPS8 FPS
ultra6 FPS6 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon HD 7970M CrossfireRadeon R9 M395
1080p
low225 FPS222 FPS
medium180 FPS178 FPS
high150 FPS148 FPS
ultra112 FPS111 FPS
1440p
low169 FPS167 FPS
medium135 FPS133 FPS
high112 FPS111 FPS
ultra84 FPS83 FPS
4K
low112 FPS111 FPS
medium90 FPS89 FPS
high75 FPS74 FPS
ultra56 FPS56 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon HD 7970M CrossfireRadeon R9 M395
1080p
low129 FPS129 FPS
medium105 FPS105 FPS
high89 FPS90 FPS
ultra74 FPS73 FPS
1440p
low98 FPS97 FPS
medium81 FPS80 FPS
high69 FPS69 FPS
ultra56 FPS55 FPS
4K
low57 FPS57 FPS
medium45 FPS44 FPS
high35 FPS35 FPS
ultra27 FPS26 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire and Radeon R9 M395

AMD

Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire

The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2012. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M395

The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire scores 5,000 and the Radeon R9 M395 reaches 4,934 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is built on GCN while the Radeon R9 M395 uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395).

FeatureRadeon HD 7970M CrossfireRadeon R9 M395
G3D Mark Score
5,000+1%
4,934
Architecture
GCN
GCN
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560+43%
1792
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 7970M CrossfireRadeon R9 M395
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 153.6 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395) — a 14.6% advantage for the Radeon R9 M395. Bus width: 256-bit x2 vs 256-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 7970M CrossfireRadeon R9 M395
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
153.6 GB/s x2
176 GB/s+15%
Bus Width
256-bit x2
256-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 M395's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon R9 M395 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon HD 7970M CrossfireRadeon R9 M395
TDP
200W
75W-63%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
25.0
65.8+163%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M395 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon HD 7970M CrossfireRadeon R9 M395
MSRP
$300
Codename
Wimbledon XT
Release
May 1 2012
June 9 2015
Ranking
#395
#445