
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M395
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+104% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 145.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 M395: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 M395 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M395
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,934 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌20.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon R9 M395
2015Why buy it
- ✅+104% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 145.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 M395: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 M395 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,934 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌20.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon R9 M395?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M395 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 6 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon R9 M395

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R9 M395
Radeon R9 M395
The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon R9 M395's 4,934 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 104%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 M395 uses GCN, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+104% | 4,934 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M395 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M395 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395) — a 9.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+9% | 176 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (FL12_0) (Radeon R9 M395). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (FL12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs UVD (Radeon R9 M395). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M395).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | UVD |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCE |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon R9 M395's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The Radeon R9 M395 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 75W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 65.8+18% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M395 launched at $300. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 17% less ($51 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 16.4 (Radeon R9 M395) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 146.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M395 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-17% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+146% | 16.4 |
| Codename | GP104 | — |
| Release | May 27 2016 | June 9 2015 |
| Ranking | #137 | #445 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













