
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M295X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Vega 20
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 20: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 20 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Radeon Pro Vega 20
2018Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 20: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 20 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro Vega 20 better than Radeon R9 M295X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R9 M295X make more sense than Radeon Pro Vega 20?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 20 and Radeon R9 M295X

Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon Pro Vega 20
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,169 points.

Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M295X
The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 scores 5,169 and the Radeon R9 M295X reaches 5,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 3.284 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,169 | 5,150 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.284 TFLOPS+11% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 512 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M295X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon Pro Vega 20 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M295X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-60% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 51.7+151% | 20.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 20 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 costs 100+% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro Vega 20) vs 17.2 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon Pro Vega 20 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 20 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 17.2 |
| Codename | Vega 12 | Amethyst |
| Release | November 14 2018 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #435 | #437 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













