
Radeon HD 8990
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M295X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 8990
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌233% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.2 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 375W vs 250W.
Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $699 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 228.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 5.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 375W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon HD 8990
2013Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $699 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 228.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 5.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 375W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌233% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.2 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 375W vs 250W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 8990 better than Radeon R9 M295X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R9 M295X make more sense than Radeon HD 8990?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 8990 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 8990 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 8990 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 8990 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8990 and Radeon R9 M295X

Radeon HD 8990
Radeon HD 8990
The Radeon HD 8990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,214 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M295X
The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8990 scores 5,214 and the Radeon R9 M295X reaches 5,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8990 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon HD 8990) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 8990) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8990 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,214+1% | 5,150 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 ×2 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS ×2+38% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 ×2 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 ×2 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8990 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8990 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M295X offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 8990) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) — a 1537.5% advantage for the Radeon HD 8990. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon HD 8990) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon HD 8990 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8990 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s x2+64% | 176 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8990 draws 375W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R9 M295X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon HD 8990) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8990 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 250W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 350W-53% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.9 | 20.6+48% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8990 launched at $999 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300. The Radeon R9 M295X costs 70% less ($699 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.2 (Radeon HD 8990) vs 17.2 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon R9 M295X offers 230.8% better value. The Radeon R9 M295X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8990 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $300-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.2 | 17.2+231% |
| Codename | Malta | Amethyst |
| Release | April 24 2013 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #412 | #437 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













