Radeon HD 8990 vs Radeon R9 M295X

AMD

Radeon HD 8990

2013Core: 950 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M295X

2014Core: 723 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon HD 8990

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 233% HIGHER MSRP
    $999 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.2 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 375W vs 250W.

Radeon R9 M295X

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $699 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 228.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 5.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
  • Draws 250W instead of 375W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon HD 8990 better than Radeon R9 M295X?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,214 vs 5,150 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon HD 8990 is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 8990 is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon HD 8990 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon HD 8990 is about 233.0% more expensive on MSRP at $999 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 1.2% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 M295X really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon R9 M295X make more sense than Radeon HD 8990?
Yes. Radeon R9 M295X is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (250W vs 375W), and staying closer to $300 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon HD 8990. The trade-off is that Radeon HD 8990 currently gives you 1.2% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 M295X still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon HD 8990Radeon R9 M295X
1080p
low77 FPS81 FPS
medium63 FPS69 FPS
high50 FPS57 FPS
ultra33 FPS37 FPS
1440p
low65 FPS71 FPS
medium54 FPS62 FPS
high38 FPS45 FPS
ultra24 FPS29 FPS
4K
low24 FPS26 FPS
medium23 FPS24 FPS
high14 FPS16 FPS
ultra12 FPS14 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon HD 8990Radeon R9 M295X
1080p
low143 FPS96 FPS
medium118 FPS74 FPS
high97 FPS61 FPS
ultra71 FPS44 FPS
1440p
low88 FPS58 FPS
medium66 FPS41 FPS
high49 FPS31 FPS
ultra37 FPS23 FPS
4K
low37 FPS23 FPS
medium28 FPS16 FPS
high21 FPS13 FPS
ultra16 FPS9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon HD 8990Radeon R9 M295X
1080p
low235 FPS232 FPS
medium188 FPS185 FPS
high156 FPS154 FPS
ultra117 FPS116 FPS
1440p
low176 FPS174 FPS
medium141 FPS139 FPS
high117 FPS116 FPS
ultra88 FPS87 FPS
4K
low117 FPS116 FPS
medium94 FPS93 FPS
high78 FPS77 FPS
ultra59 FPS58 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon HD 8990Radeon R9 M295X
1080p
low145 FPS139 FPS
medium116 FPS113 FPS
high100 FPS97 FPS
ultra83 FPS81 FPS
1440p
low107 FPS104 FPS
medium87 FPS85 FPS
high75 FPS74 FPS
ultra58 FPS57 FPS
4K
low63 FPS61 FPS
medium48 FPS47 FPS
high38 FPS37 FPS
ultra26 FPS26 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8990 and Radeon R9 M295X

AMD

Radeon HD 8990

The Radeon HD 8990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,214 points. Launch price was $999.

AMD

Radeon R9 M295X

The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8990 scores 5,214 and the Radeon R9 M295X reaches 5,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8990 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon HD 8990) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 8990) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).

FeatureRadeon HD 8990Radeon R9 M295X
G3D Mark Score
5,214+1%
5,150
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048 ×2
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.096 TFLOPS ×2+38%
2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs
32 ×2
32
TMUs
128 ×2
128
L1 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 8990Radeon R9 M295X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 8990 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M295X offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 8990) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) — a 1537.5% advantage for the Radeon HD 8990. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon HD 8990) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon HD 8990 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 8990Radeon R9 M295X
VRAM Capacity
3 GB
4 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s x2+64%
176 GB/s
Bus Width
384-bit x2+50%
256-bit
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8990 draws 375W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R9 M295X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon HD 8990) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon HD 8990Radeon R9 M295X
TDP
375W
250W-33%
Recommended PSU
750W
350W-53%
Power Connector
2x 8-pin
Mobile
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
13.9
20.6+48%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 8990 launched at $999 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300. The Radeon R9 M295X costs 70% less ($699 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.2 (Radeon HD 8990) vs 17.2 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon R9 M295X offers 230.8% better value. The Radeon R9 M295X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon HD 8990Radeon R9 M295X
MSRP
$999
$300-70%
Performance per Dollar
5.2
17.2+231%
Codename
Malta
Amethyst
Release
April 24 2013
November 23 2014
Ranking
#412
#437