
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M295X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌27400% longer card at 275mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 275mm, a 274mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌0.3% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
2013Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 275mm, a 274mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌27400% longer card at 275mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌0.3% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X better than Radeon R9 M295X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R9 M295X make more sense than Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X and Radeon R9 M295X

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,248 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M295X
The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X scores 5,248 and the Radeon R9 M295X reaches 5,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,248+2% | 5,150 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS+38% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M295X offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 264 GB/s (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) — a 50% advantage for the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 264 GB/s+50% | 176 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M295X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 275mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 275mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.2+27% | 20.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300. The Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X costs 0.3% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.6 (Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X) vs 17.2 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X offers 2.3% better value. The Radeon R9 M295X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.6+2% | 17.2 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Amethyst |
| Release | October 8 2013 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #404 | #437 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













