
GRID P4-8Q
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M295X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID P4-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌566.7% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 549.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
GRID P4-8Q
2015Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 549.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌566.7% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is GRID P4-8Q better than Radeon R9 M295X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M295X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID P4-8Q | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID P4-8Q | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID P4-8Q | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID P4-8Q | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P4-8Q and Radeon R9 M295X

GRID P4-8Q
GRID P4-8Q
The GRID P4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,283 points.

Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M295X
The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P4-8Q scores 5,283 and the Radeon R9 M295X reaches 5,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P4-8Q) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P4-8Q) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).
| Feature | GRID P4-8Q | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,283+3% | 5,150 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.218 TFLOPS | 2.961 TFLOPS+33% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 128+33% |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+13% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P4-8Q | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X) — the GRID P4-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P4-8Q | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P4-8Q draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 85.7% difference. The GRID P4-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | GRID P4-8Q | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-60% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8+156% | 20.6 |
Value Analysis
The GRID P4-8Q launched at $2000 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300. The Radeon R9 M295X costs 85% less ($1700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (GRID P4-8Q) vs 17.2 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon R9 M295X offers 561.5% better value. The GRID P4-8Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GRID P4-8Q | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $300-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.6 | 17.2+562% |
| Codename | GM204 | Amethyst |
| Release | August 30 2015 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #535 | #437 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













