GRID P4-8Q vs Radeon R9 M295X

GRID P4-8Q

2015Core: 722 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M295X

2014Core: 723 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GRID P4-8Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 566.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M295X

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 549.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

So, is GRID P4-8Q better than Radeon R9 M295X?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,283 vs 5,150 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GRID P4-8Q is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (100W vs 250W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GRID P4-8Q is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014 and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GRID P4-8Q is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GRID P4-8Q is about 566.7% more expensive on MSRP at $2,000 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 2.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 M295X really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon R9 M295X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 M295X is 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 5,150 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGRID P4-8QRadeon R9 M295X
1080p
low106 FPS104 FPS
medium91 FPS89 FPS
high75 FPS72 FPS
ultra44 FPS43 FPS
1440p
low92 FPS90 FPS
medium81 FPS79 FPS
high60 FPS57 FPS
ultra34 FPS33 FPS
4K
low29 FPS29 FPS
medium28 FPS27 FPS
high19 FPS18 FPS
ultra16 FPS16 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGRID P4-8QRadeon R9 M295X
1080p
low150 FPS96 FPS
medium118 FPS74 FPS
high88 FPS61 FPS
ultra69 FPS44 FPS
1440p
low112 FPS58 FPS
medium86 FPS41 FPS
high69 FPS31 FPS
ultra53 FPS23 FPS
4K
low62 FPS23 FPS
medium48 FPS16 FPS
high39 FPS13 FPS
ultra30 FPS9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGRID P4-8QRadeon R9 M295X
1080p
low238 FPS232 FPS
medium190 FPS185 FPS
high158 FPS154 FPS
ultra119 FPS116 FPS
1440p
low178 FPS174 FPS
medium143 FPS139 FPS
high119 FPS116 FPS
ultra89 FPS87 FPS
4K
low119 FPS116 FPS
medium95 FPS93 FPS
high79 FPS77 FPS
ultra59 FPS58 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGRID P4-8QRadeon R9 M295X
1080p
low184 FPS139 FPS
medium150 FPS113 FPS
high133 FPS97 FPS
ultra103 FPS81 FPS
1440p
low132 FPS104 FPS
medium111 FPS85 FPS
high99 FPS74 FPS
ultra76 FPS57 FPS
4K
low77 FPS61 FPS
medium60 FPS47 FPS
high49 FPS37 FPS
ultra36 FPS26 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID P4-8Q and Radeon R9 M295X

NVIDIA

GRID P4-8Q

The GRID P4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,283 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M295X

The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P4-8Q scores 5,283 and the Radeon R9 M295X reaches 5,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P4-8Q) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P4-8Q) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).

FeatureGRID P4-8QRadeon R9 M295X
G3D Mark Score
5,283+3%
5,150
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536
2048+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.218 TFLOPS
2.961 TFLOPS+33%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
96
128+33%
L1 Cache
576 KB+13%
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P4-8QRadeon R9 M295X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X) — the GRID P4-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID P4-8QRadeon R9 M295X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P4-8Q draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 85.7% difference. The GRID P4-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureGRID P4-8QRadeon R9 M295X
TDP
100W-60%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
52.8+156%
20.6
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID P4-8Q launched at $2000 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300. The Radeon R9 M295X costs 85% less ($1700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (GRID P4-8Q) vs 17.2 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon R9 M295X offers 561.5% better value. The GRID P4-8Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureGRID P4-8QRadeon R9 M295X
MSRP
$2000
$300-85%
Performance per Dollar
2.6
17.2+562%
Codename
GM204
Amethyst
Release
August 30 2015
November 23 2014
Ranking
#535
#437