GRID M60-2Q vs Radeon R9 M295X

GRID M60-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M295X

2014Core: 723 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GRID M60-2Q

2015

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 900% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,000 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M295X

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,700 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 889.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is GRID M60-2Q better than Radeon R9 M295X?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,203 vs 5,150 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GRID M60-2Q is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GRID M60-2Q is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014 and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GRID M60-2Q is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GRID M60-2Q is about 900.0% more expensive on MSRP at $3,000 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 1.0% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 M295X really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon R9 M295X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 M295X is 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 5,150 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGRID M60-2QRadeon R9 M295X
1080p
low104 FPS104 FPS
medium90 FPS89 FPS
high73 FPS72 FPS
ultra44 FPS43 FPS
1440p
low91 FPS90 FPS
medium80 FPS79 FPS
high58 FPS57 FPS
ultra33 FPS33 FPS
4K
low29 FPS29 FPS
medium27 FPS27 FPS
high18 FPS18 FPS
ultra16 FPS16 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGRID M60-2QRadeon R9 M295X
1080p
low162 FPS96 FPS
medium128 FPS74 FPS
high94 FPS61 FPS
ultra75 FPS44 FPS
1440p
low119 FPS58 FPS
medium92 FPS41 FPS
high74 FPS31 FPS
ultra57 FPS23 FPS
4K
low68 FPS23 FPS
medium52 FPS16 FPS
high43 FPS13 FPS
ultra32 FPS9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGRID M60-2QRadeon R9 M295X
1080p
low234 FPS232 FPS
medium187 FPS185 FPS
high156 FPS154 FPS
ultra117 FPS116 FPS
1440p
low176 FPS174 FPS
medium140 FPS139 FPS
high117 FPS116 FPS
ultra88 FPS87 FPS
4K
low117 FPS116 FPS
medium94 FPS93 FPS
high78 FPS77 FPS
ultra59 FPS58 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGRID M60-2QRadeon R9 M295X
1080p
low182 FPS139 FPS
medium148 FPS113 FPS
high133 FPS97 FPS
ultra103 FPS81 FPS
1440p
low132 FPS104 FPS
medium110 FPS85 FPS
high99 FPS74 FPS
ultra77 FPS57 FPS
4K
low77 FPS61 FPS
medium60 FPS47 FPS
high49 FPS37 FPS
ultra36 FPS26 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID M60-2Q and Radeon R9 M295X

NVIDIA

GRID M60-2Q

The GRID M60-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,203 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M295X

The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-2Q scores 5,203 and the Radeon R9 M295X reaches 5,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-2Q) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-2Q) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).

FeatureGRID M60-2QRadeon R9 M295X
G3D Mark Score
5,203+1%
5,150
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+63%
2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
128
128
L1 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M60-2QRadeon R9 M295X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-2Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X) — the GRID M60-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID M60-2QRadeon R9 M295X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID M60-2Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-2Q) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureGRID M60-2QRadeon R9 M295X
TDP
225W-10%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
23.1+12%
20.6
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID M60-2Q launched at $3000 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300. The Radeon R9 M295X costs 90% less ($2700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (GRID M60-2Q) vs 17.2 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon R9 M295X offers 911.8% better value. The GRID M60-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureGRID M60-2QRadeon R9 M295X
MSRP
$3000
$300-90%
Performance per Dollar
1.7
17.2+912%
Codename
GM204
Amethyst
Release
August 30 2015
November 23 2014
Ranking
#433
#437