G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro W7100

2014

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
166.3% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌24000% longer card at 241mm vs 1mm.

Radeon R9 M295X

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 170.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Measures 1mm instead of 241mm, a 240mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.

FirePro W7100

2014

Radeon R9 M295X

2014

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 170.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Measures 1mm instead of 241mm, a 240mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
166.3% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌24000% longer card at 241mm vs 1mm.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon R9 M295X better than FirePro W7100?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,065 vs 5,150 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon R9 M295X is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W7100 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon R9 M295X can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $300 MSRP. Radeon R9 M295X is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon R9 M295X is about $499 cheaper on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and you are getting 1.7% higher G3D Mark. FirePro W7100 is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about lower power draw (150W vs 250W) and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does FirePro W7100 make more sense than Radeon R9 M295X?

Yes. FirePro W7100 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (150W vs 250W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $799 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon R9 M295X. The trade-off is that Radeon R9 M295X currently gives you 1.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 170.8%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro W7100 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 M295X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	FirePro W7100	Radeon R9 M295X
1080p
low	133 FPS	81 FPS
medium	113 FPS	69 FPS
high	94 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	37 FPS
1440p
low	114 FPS	71 FPS
medium	96 FPS	62 FPS
high	71 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	42 FPS	29 FPS
4K
low	40 FPS	26 FPS
medium	36 FPS	24 FPS
high	23 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	19 FPS	14 FPS

Open FirePro W7100 Open Radeon R9 M295X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	FirePro W7100	Radeon R9 M295X
1080p
low	189 FPS	96 FPS
medium	152 FPS	74 FPS
high	118 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	44 FPS
1440p
low	127 FPS	58 FPS
medium	98 FPS	41 FPS
high	77 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	23 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	23 FPS
medium	51 FPS	16 FPS
high	40 FPS	13 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	9 FPS

Open FirePro W7100 Open Radeon R9 M295X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	FirePro W7100	Radeon R9 M295X
1080p
low	228 FPS	232 FPS
medium	182 FPS	185 FPS
high	152 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	114 FPS	116 FPS
1440p
low	171 FPS	174 FPS
medium	137 FPS	139 FPS
high	114 FPS	116 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	87 FPS
4K
low	114 FPS	116 FPS
medium	91 FPS	93 FPS
high	76 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	58 FPS

Open FirePro W7100 Open Radeon R9 M295X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	FirePro W7100	Radeon R9 M295X
1080p
low	228 FPS	139 FPS
medium	182 FPS	113 FPS
high	152 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	114 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	171 FPS	104 FPS
medium	137 FPS	85 FPS
high	114 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	57 FPS
4K
low	112 FPS	61 FPS
medium	88 FPS	47 FPS
high	71 FPS	37 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	26 FPS

Open FirePro W7100 Open Radeon R9 M295X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7100 and Radeon R9 M295X

FirePro W7100

The FirePro W7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,065 points.

Radeon R9 M295X

The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W7100 scores 5,065 and the Radeon R9 M295X reaches 5,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W7100 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (FirePro W7100) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 3.297 TFLOPS (FirePro W7100) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).

Feature	FirePro W7100	Radeon R9 M295X
G3D Mark Score	5,065	5,150+2%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1792	2048+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.297 TFLOPS+11%	2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	112	128+14%
L1 Cache	448 KB	512 KB+14%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W7100	Radeon R9 M295X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W7100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X has 4 GB. The FirePro W7100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	FirePro W7100	Radeon R9 M295X
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (FirePro W7100) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M295X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	FirePro W7100	Radeon R9 M295X
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro W7100) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	FirePro W7100	Radeon R9 M295X
Encoder	VCE 3.0	VCE 3.0
Decoder	UVD 5.0	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7100 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 50% difference. The FirePro W7100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7100) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 241mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	FirePro W7100	Radeon R9 M295X
TDP	150W-40%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	241mm	1mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	95	—
Perf/Watt	33.8+64%	20.6

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W7100 launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300. The Radeon R9 M295X costs 62.5% less ($499 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.3 (FirePro W7100) vs 17.2 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the Radeon R9 M295X offers 173% better value.