
Arc A370M
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M295X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A370M
2022Why buy it
- β More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022β2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- β Draws 35W instead of 250W, a 215W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022β2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β614.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 35W.
Arc A370M
2022Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- β More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022β2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- β Draws 35W instead of 250W, a 215W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022β2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β614.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 M295X better than Arc A370M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Arc A370M make more sense than Radeon R9 M295X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A370M | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A370M | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A370M | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 58 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A370M | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A370M and Radeon R9 M295X

Arc A370M
Arc A370M
The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.

Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M295X
The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A370M scores 5,115 and the Radeon R9 M295X reaches 5,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A370M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A370M) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).
| Feature | Arc A370M | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,115 | 5,150 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.174 TFLOPS+7% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A370M | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (Arc A370M) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) β a 57.1% advantage for the Radeon R9 M295X. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A370M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X) β the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A370M | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 176 GB/s+57% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A370M) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M295X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Arc A370M | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A370M) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Arc A370M | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | β |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A370M draws 35W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W β a 150.9% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc A370M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Arc A370M | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-86% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 146.1+609% | 20.6 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A370M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | Arc A370M | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | β | $300 |
| Codename | DG2-128 | Amethyst |
| Release | March 30 2022 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #439 | #437 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













